Newspaper comparison
The story of Luis Posada Carriles is one of intrigue. Apparently, he received training from the CIA in the early 1960s and currently he is the main suspect in a Cuban airline bombing that killed 73 civilians in 1976. He also stands accused of numerous assassination threats against the Cuban leader Fidel Castro. Carrlies, a Venezuelan citizen, has been on the run ever since. Things became interesting in May when he turned up in Miami and started holding impromptu press conferences. This prompted the government of Venezuela to request his extradition. Just days ago in El Paso, immigration Judge William L. Abbott ruled that he would not be deported to Venezuela (a ruling five months in the making).
The local newspapers and opinion in Venezuela have been astounded by the US response. They are quick to point out the hypocrisy displayed by the United States in their failure to deport him to Venezuela stating:
There is a cynical double standard at work here fighting an 'Â a la carte' war on terror. On the one hand, the United States presents itself to the world as the leader of a global war against terrorism, invades countries it accuses of terrorism and restricts the civil rights of Americans in order to combat terrorism.
On the other hand, when it comes to its own terrorist whom it has recruited and coddled for years, the United States refuses to allow that he is tried for some of the heinous crimes he has committed.
However, our local papers have painted the suspected terrorist as a 'Cuban militant'. They do cite various sides of the issue. This includes his defense that he would be tortured Venezuelala, as well state an opposing view from the director of the Cuban Defense League. Elena Freyre states "It seems to me that this would have been exactly what this administration would not have wanted in this particular case. What we have here is a very elegant, if you want to call it that, or sneaky, if you want to call it that, maneuver to allow him to remain in this country."
What is interesting to me is that our government cites the Convention Against Torture which was adopted by the United Nations in 1984. Since when have we cited, or cared for international law in recent years? It does seem that the U.S. has conflicting interests, which areitherer zealously pursue 'evildoers' or to maintain a strong anti-Cuban policy. Ahhh, politics. Its all so awkward sometimes.
The local newspapers and opinion in Venezuela have been astounded by the US response. They are quick to point out the hypocrisy displayed by the United States in their failure to deport him to Venezuela stating:
There is a cynical double standard at work here fighting an 'Â a la carte' war on terror. On the one hand, the United States presents itself to the world as the leader of a global war against terrorism, invades countries it accuses of terrorism and restricts the civil rights of Americans in order to combat terrorism.
On the other hand, when it comes to its own terrorist whom it has recruited and coddled for years, the United States refuses to allow that he is tried for some of the heinous crimes he has committed.
However, our local papers have painted the suspected terrorist as a 'Cuban militant'. They do cite various sides of the issue. This includes his defense that he would be tortured Venezuelala, as well state an opposing view from the director of the Cuban Defense League. Elena Freyre states "It seems to me that this would have been exactly what this administration would not have wanted in this particular case. What we have here is a very elegant, if you want to call it that, or sneaky, if you want to call it that, maneuver to allow him to remain in this country."
What is interesting to me is that our government cites the Convention Against Torture which was adopted by the United Nations in 1984. Since when have we cited, or cared for international law in recent years? It does seem that the U.S. has conflicting interests, which areitherer zealously pursue 'evildoers' or to maintain a strong anti-Cuban policy. Ahhh, politics. Its all so awkward sometimes.

